Review the results of your APEA predictor exam. Identify the knowledge area in w

by | Jun 19, 2022 | Nursing

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Review the results of your APEA predictor exam. Identify the knowledge area in which the student score was lowest. (Mine was Hematology)
Create an original case study based on a common chief complaint seen in older adults in primary care related to the low-scoring knowledge area. (Scored Low in Hematology)Select a chief complaint not already covered in this term’s iHuman case studies. Case study requirements: Chief Complaint (Pain in calf of right leg)
Provide chief complaint, PMHx, demographics, PSHx, allergies, lifestyle, HPI
Analyze associated risk factors/demographics that contribute to the chief complaint and differential diagnoses
List three common differential diagnoses for the chief complaint including pathophysiology and rationale
Discuss how the three differential diagnoses differ from each other in occurrence, pathophysiology, and presentation. Your discussion should compare and contrast these diagnoses rather than listing them.
Describe relevant testing required to diagnose/evaluate the severity of the three differential diagnoses
Present applicable National Guidelines related to diagnosis and diagnostic testing for these diagnoses
Rubic
Application of Course Knowledge
Post contributes unique perspectives/insights applicable to the identified content/chief complaint presentation area. Case study must include the following:
1. Provide chief complaint, PMHx, demographics, PSHx, allergies, lifestyle, HPI
2. Analyze associated risk factors/demographics that contribute to the chief complaint and differential diagnoses
3. List three common differential diagnoses for the chief complaint including pathophysiology and rationale
4. Discuss how the three differential diagnoses differ from each other in occurrence, pathophysiology, and presentation. Your discussion should compare and contrast these diagnoses rather than listing them.
5. Describe relevant testing required to diagnose/evaluate the severity of the three differential diagnoses
6. Present applicable National Guidelines related to diagnosis and diagnostic testing for these diagnoses
(6 critical elements)
22 pts
Excellent
All 6 critical elements are present and addressed substantively.
20 pts
V. Good
All 6 critical elements are present, but some information may be superficial in places.
18 pts
Satisfactory
Discussion of some critical elements is minimal OR 1 critical element is missing
11 pts
Needs Improvement
2-3 critical elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 3 critical elements are missing
22 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupport from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
1. Discussion post fully supported by evidence from appropriate sources including National Guidelines
2. Journal articles published within the last five years unless approved by instructor. Most current version of CPGs used
3. Content of journal articles represents a logical link between the article content and the assigned topics/case study information
4. In-text citations and complete references are provided
(4 critical elements)
22 pts
Excellent
All 4 critical elements are present
20 pts
V. Good
All 4 critical elements are present with 1-2 minor omissions
18 pts
Satisfactory
1 critical element is missing or all four critical elements are present with 3-4 minor omissions
11 pts
Needs Improvement
2 critical elements are missing or all four critical elements are present with 5-6 minor omissions
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 2 critical elements are missing or greater than 6 omissions
22 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInteractive Dialogue
Interactive Dialogue
1. Substantive posts contribute new, novel perspectives to the discussion using original dialogue (not quotes from sources)
2. Respond to at least one peer
3. Responds to all direct questions posed by faculty
4. Includes evidence from at least one scholarly resource to support interactive dialogue
(4 critical elements)
16 pts
Excellent
All 4 critical elements are present
15 pts
V. Good
All 4 critical elements are present with 1-2 minor omissions
13 pts
Satisfactory
All 4 critical elements are present with 3-4 minor omissions
8 pts
Needs Improvement
1 critical element is missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
2 or more critical elements are missing
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
Organization
1. Case study responses are presented in a logical format
2. Responses are in sequence with the numbered questions
3. The case study response is understandable and easy to follow
4. All responses are relevant to the case topic
(4 critical elements)
3 pts
Excellent
All 4 critical elements are present
2.5 pts
V. Good
All 4 critical elements are present, may not be fully organized.
2 pts
Satisfactory
1 critical element is missing
1.5 pts
Needs Improvement
2 critical elements are missing
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 2 critical elements are missing.
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Syntax, APA
Discussion post has minimal grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format errors*
(*) APA style references and in-text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.
2 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format*
1.5 pts
V. Good
2-3 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format*
1 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format*
0.5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-9 errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format*
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
10 or more errors in grammar, syntax, spelling, punctuation, or APA format*
2 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion late penalty deductions
A 10% late penalty will be imposed for discussions posted after 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday, regardless of the number of days late. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday (i.e., student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts
No Points Deducted
0 pts
Points deducted for late or missing posts
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTotal Participation Responses
A 10% penalty will be imposed for not entering the minimum number/type of interactive dialogue posts OR not posting on at least two separate days. NOTHING will be accepted after 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday (i.e., student will receive an automatic 0)
0 pts
No Points Deducted
0 pts
Points deducted for late or missing posts
0 pts

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Ready to get started?