Select Page

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitati

Nursing

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the topic Resources or textbook.
Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics – Rubric
Article (Quantitative, APA Citation and Permalink)
7 points
Article Citation and Permalink
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Article Citation and Permalink
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format. Page numbers are used in to cite information. There are minor errors.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Article citation and permalink are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Article citation and permalink are omitted.
Broad Topic Area/Title
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Broad Topic Area/Title
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Broad topic area and title are presented. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Broad topic area and title are omitted.
Problem Statement
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Problem Statement
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Problem statement is accurate and clearly summarized.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Problem statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Problem statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Problem statement is referenced but is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Problem statement is omitted or incorrect.
Purpose Statement
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Purpose Statement
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Purpose statement is accurate and clearly summarized.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Purpose statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Purpose statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Purpose statement is referenced but is incomplete.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Purpose statement is omitted or incorrect.
Research Questions
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Research Questions
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Research questions are presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
N/A
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
N/A
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Research questions are partially presented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Research questions are omitted or incorrect.
Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used.)
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used.)
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Hypothesis is accurate and clearly defined
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Hypothesis is defined. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Hypothesis is summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Definition of hypothesis is omitted. The definition of the hypothesis is incorrect.
Identify Variables and Type of Data for Variables
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Identify Variables and Type of Data for Variables
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Variable type and data for variable are presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Variable type and data for variable are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Variable type and data for variable are omitted.
Population of Interest for Study
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Population of Interest for Study
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Population of interest for the study is omitted.
Sample
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Sample
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sample is omitted.
Sampling Method
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Sampling Method
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Sampling method is presented and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Sampling method is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Sampling method is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Sampling method is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sampling method is omitted.
Identify Data Collection
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Identify Data Collection
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
How data were collected is fully identified and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
How data were collected is identified. There are minor inaccuracies
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
How data were collected is partially presented. There are inaccuracies or omissions.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
How data were collected is presented but is incorrect.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
How data were collected is not identified.
Summary of Data Collection Approach
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Summary of Data Collection Approach
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
The means of data collection are thoroughly summarized and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
The means of data collection are summarized. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
The means of data collection are referenced. There are major inaccuracies or omissions.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The means of data collection are omitted.
Data Analysis
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Data Analysis
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
Data analysis is discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are all indicated and accurate.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Data analysis is generally discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There minor inaccuracies.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Data analysis is summarized. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There are inaccuracies or omissions.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Data analysis is incomplete. Not all types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. The types of statistical tests listed are incorrect or unrelated to the variables indicated.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Data analysis is omitted.
Summary Results of Study
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Summary Results of Study
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
The results of study are well summarized. The summary is accurate and clearly represents the results of the study.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
The results of study are summarized. Minor detail or information is needed for accuracy or clarity.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
The results of study are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. Some information or rationale is needed for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
The results of the study are partially presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. More information is needed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Summary of the results of the study is omitted or incorrect.
Summary Assumptions and Limitations
14 points
Criteria Descriiption
Summary Assumptions and Limitations
5. 5: Excellent
14 points
Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Strong rationale is provided to support summary.
4. 4: Good
11.9 points
Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Some information or rationale is needed for support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.5 points
Most assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More information or rationale is needed for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.1 points
Some assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are partially presented. Significant information is needed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Identification of assumptions and limitations by the author is omitted. Summary of potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author is omitted or not relevant to the study.
Summary of Ethical Considerations
14 points
Criteria Descriiption
Summary of Ethical Considerations
5. 5: Excellent
14 points
Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are clearly summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Strong rationale and support are provided.
4. 4: Good
11.9 points
Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Some rationale or evidence are needed to support summary.
3. 3: Satisfactory
10.5 points
Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are presented. There are some inaccuracies. Some information and rationale are needed to support summary.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
9.1 points
Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are incomplete. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Significant information and rationale are needed to support summary.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Summary of ethical considerations is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing
7 points
Criteria Descriiption
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
5. 5: Excellent
7 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
5.95 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.25 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.55 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Writers for any paper

We have 500+ professional essay writers on our team. These are experts who work in colleges and universities .Eliteacademicessays.com is one of the most versatile essay writing services in the industry. You’ll get an MA or PhD essay writer from the subject area you choose. You can order a paper on any topic from us!

High Quality

We stand behind the quality of our services every time, no matter the subject or difficulty.

 

24/7 Support

We’re always there for you, working nonstop to help you in your hour of academic need.

Timely Delivery

Time is the most important thing these days and we understand that you turned to us to save yours.

 

Original Content

Every word you read in the paper we’ve written is original, every thought is unique.

 

Free Revision

Not only do we write quality academic works, we also offer absolutely free revisions so that you can correct anything you need.

100% Anonymous

We’re always there for you, working nonstop to help you in your hour of academic need.

Easy As 1…2…3…

1. Place Order/Submit Instructions
Submit the instructions in the order form. Add the number of the pages, the deadline, and attach any additional files.

2.Make Payments
Securely complete the payment process.

3. Writer Upload Solution for Quality Check

We will assign your work a writer, sit back and relax. The Quality Control department will check and verify completion to set standards.

4. Download Paper and Enjoy
Now download the uploaded solution and enjoy your life.

Confidentiality

We encrypt everything. It’s all confidential.

Secure Payment

Sleep tight: each transaction is encrypted and 100% secure.

Ready to get started?

%d bloggers like this: