The evolution of leadership theory brought attention to early study findings tha

by | Jan 18, 2022 | Human Resource Management | 0 comments

GET HELP WITH YOUR ESSAY

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional Essay Writing Service is here to help!

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

The evolution of leadership theory brought attention to early study findings that identified leader traits that were based on a narrow segment of the population. As diversity in leadership gained consideration, the subject was often added to the foundation of earlier studies.
Leaders in all settings have an obligation to recognize their own biases and observe individuals and cultural dynamics as objectively as possible. Take the opportunity in this Critical Thinking Assignment to practice objectivity in research.
This Critical Thinking Assignment culminates in the form of a management report based on data from your own observational research within your work environment or community organization. The problem that you are investigating is the low percentage of women in formal leadership positions in the organization. Gather scholarly articles on two leadership theories associated with diversity, especially gender diversity, to serve as a backdrop for your investigation.
To prepare for the observational research, work to set aside any preconceived notions of what might be discovered. Also, look beyond the human actors to note the role of non-human elements of the setting. Select a group or team within the organization to observe and answer the following:
Who is sitting at the leadership table? Who is absent?
Whose voices are heard? Whose aren’t, and why?
Whose values and interests are represented?
Is there leadership that goes unnoticed?
NOTE: if you are unable to physically access a location for observational research or to conduct such observations in general, you may complete this assignment by doing one of the following:
Enlist the support of another person who can help you interpret the group.
Write a paper about the best practices to employ, using a group scenario that you construct and describe. Address all the questions and requirements in the regular assignment.
Ask a group if you may observe them using SKYPE or FaceTime, for example. Reach out to your instructor for more assistance if needed.
After the observations are completed, prepare the data for analysis. You might define categories or identify themes based on what was recorded. Then analyze the data according to relevant diversity leadership theories that you gathered, from this week’s required readings, and from the lecture.
Prepare a management report for a hypothetical audience of managers having a stake in the stated problem.
Requirements for the Management Report
Include five sections. The report sections include:
The Introduction of your investigation, including a statement about why the research is important. (Remember your audience!)
A descriiption of how you collected the observational data, prepared data, and analyzed for results. Explain why these methods are appropriate and support with scholarly sources.
A literature review of two associated theories.
A discussion of the results and how managers might use the findings to address the stated problem.
A summary of the investigative process and a closing statement of what you, the researcher, learned from the study.
Add appendices to include raw data, data preparation worksheets, or analytic tools.
Include associated citations and reference pages.
Additional Requirements:
Your paper should be 4-6 pages in length and conform to APA guidelines in the CSU Global Writing Center (Links to an external site.).
Include at 2-5 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook. The CSU Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these references.
Below is the rubric:
Requirements
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
15 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
12 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
9 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
6 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples don’t meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.

DISCOUNT CODE FIRST25

ORDER THIS OR A SIMILAR PAPER NOW

Ready to get started?